The High Court at Goa disposed of the writ petition when the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition based on the respondents agreeing to follow principles of natural justice.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 743 OF 2011
DR. (MRS) PURNIMA SANJEEV GHADI., ... Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF GOA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY (EDUCATION) AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents
... Respondents
Shri S.D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Shri H. Kankonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri A. Kakodkar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2.
Shri Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for Respondents No.3 & 4. Mrs. A. Agni, Advocate for Respondent No.5.
Coram:F. M. REIS &
U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:16th December, 2011
P.C.:
Heard Shri S.D. Lotlikar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Shri A. Kakodkar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents no.1 & 2, Shri Sudesh Usgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for respondents no.3 & 4 and Ms. A. Agni, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.5.
above petition. The petition stands accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. All contentions raised by both the parties are left open.
F. M. REIS, J.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
NH
DR. (MRS) PURNIMA SANJEEV GHADI.
THE STATE OF GOA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY (EDUCATION) AND 4 ORS.
F. M. REIS
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
