The High Court Bench at Aurangabad disposed of Writ Petition No.6422/2011, condemning condition No.2 of an impugned order and directing a 15-day status quo on the property involved.
15 days status quo on the property involved in the Revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
W.P.No.6422/11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.6422 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions
andRegistrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.P.B.Vikhe, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.V.J.Dixit, Senior counsel instructed by
Mr.L.V.Sangit, advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.
Date : 24.11.2011.
PER COURT :
1.6.2011, passed by the Hon'ble Minister does not survive. As such
2
W.P.No.6422/11
nothing remains in the Writ Petition. Mr.Dixit, learned Senior counsel submits that the present Respondent No.1 is intending to prefer appeal against the said order and till the appeal period, the parties be directed to maintain statusquo, as the said order is in force during the pendency of the Revision also.
(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)Dt.24.11.2011. asp/office/wp6422.11
3
W.P.No.6422/11
Petitioner
Respondent
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court