This order records the withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 5983 of 2010 by the petitioners with liberty to make appropriate representation. The State Government is directed to decide the matter in accordance with the law laid down in Voltas Ltd.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1: 5983.10-wp
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5983 OF 2010
Vishwanath Rajaram Akolkar & Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents Mr.Amit Borkar for petitioners. Mr.S.N.Patil, AGP for respondents.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & R.G.KETKAR,JJ. DATE :- JANUARY 7, 2011 P.C. Heard.
Perused petition.
On the motion made by Learned Counsel for the petitioners, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to make appropriate representation to the State Government. The State Government is expected to decide the same in accordance with the law laid down by this Court in the case of Voltas Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Additional Collector & Competent Authority & Ors. 2008(5) Bom.C.R.746. Petition accordingly stands disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
(R.G.KETKAR,J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Voltas Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Additional Collector & Competent Authority & Ors.Referred¶8
Voltas Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Additional Collector & Competent Authority & Ors. 2008(5) Bom.C.R.746 · Who else cites this
Vishwanath Rajaram Akolkar
State of Maharashtra
V.C. Daga
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
