This judgment allows the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the High Court dismisses the writ petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the Writ Petition; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp3057.11
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3057 OF 2011
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Shri.V.P. Kadam Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri.D.R. Korde, A.G.P. for Respondent
No.1.
Shri.V.S.Panpatte Advocate for Respondent
No.3.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL &
T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE : 17TH DECEMBER, 2011.
1. Learned counsel for the
Petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave
to withdraw the Writ Petition. Leave
granted. The Writ Petition is dismissed
as withdrawn.
[T.V. NALAWADE,J.] [NARESH H.PATIL,J.]
asb/DEC11
Petitioner
Respondent No.1
Respondent No.3
NARESH H. PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court