In a group of nine related writ petitions filed against the Union of India, the petitioners instructed counsel to withdraw the petitions as they had become infructuous. The court disposed of all writ petitions accordingly as withdrawn and vacated any interim orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WP/4260/2002/group
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
1
1] WRIT PETITION NO. 4260 OF 2002
Samarth Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
Vs.
Union of India and others.
2] WRIT PETITION NO. 313 OF 2003
Jai Mahesh Sugar Industries Ltd. Pawarwadi
Vs.
Union of India and others.
3] WRIT PETITION NO. 668 OF 2003.
Jai Shivshankar S.S.K. Ltd.
Vs.
Union of India and others.
4] WRIT PETITION NO. 4274 OF 2002.
Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WP/4260/2002/group
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
2
Vs.
Union of India and others.
--5] WRIT PETITION NO. 4327 of 2002
Gajanan Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
Vs.
Union of India and others.
6] WRIT PETITION NO. 4392 of 2002 Bhaurao Chavan Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana , Laxminagar
Vs.
Union of India and others.
7] WRIT PETITION NO. 4608 OF 2002.
Jai Mahesh Sugar Industries Ltd.
Vs.
Union of India and others.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WP/4260/2002/group
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
3
8] WRIT PETITION NO. 4609 OF 2002.
Narsinha Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana
Vs.
Union of India and others.
9] WRIT PETITION NO. 4710 OF 2002
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana
Vs.
Union of India and others.
Mr. A.A. Nimbalkar, Advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General, for Union of India. Mr. Mr. K.M. Surayawanshi/ Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar,/ Mr. V.H. Dighe,/ Mrs. V.A. Shinde, Assistant Govt. Pleader for respondent – State.
CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE :- 11TH AUGUST, 2011.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WP/4260/2002/group
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
4
PER COURT :-
1] Learned counsel for the petitioners in this group of 9 writ petition submits that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petitions as they have rendered infructuous.
2] Writ petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
[S.B. DESHMUKH,J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.]
grt/-
Samarth Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
Union of India
D.B. Bhosale
S.B. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
