This Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the electoral process at the stage of this writ as the petitioner had an alternate and equally efficacious remedy to impugn the same. The Court directed parties to raise contentions in that forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp4247-11.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4247 OF 2011
Irfaan Imamuddin Suse versus
The Village Panchayat, Kudus & Ors
.. Petitioner
.. Respondents
Mr.Anilkumar Patil for the petitioner. Mr.A.B.Vagyani, A.G.P for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr.Sachindra B. Shetye for respondent No.4.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 22nd JUNE 2011.
P.C.:
Having perused the petition and the annexures thereto, I am of the opinion that there is no reason to interfere at this stage as the petitioner has alternate and equally efficacious remedy in law to impugn the electoral process raising all grievances pertaining thereto and particularly forming part of this petition. Keeping open
all contentions of the parties in that behalf, this petition is dismissed .
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this Court should interfere in the factual and electoral grievances raised by the petitioner.
Irfaan Imamuddin Suse
The Village Panchayat, Kudus
S. C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
