The writ petition was disposed of for non-prosecution as the petitioner, via office notes, indicated they did not wish to proceed further with the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3810 OF 1995
(Dilipkumar G. Sanada vs. The Secretary, Urban Development Department & Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. JULY 01, 2011.
Heard.
Perused Pursis Stamp No. 5147 of 2011.
In view of the statement in the pursis that the petitioner does not want to proceed further with the petition, the same stands disposed of for non prosecution.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*GS.
Dilipkumar G. Sanada
The Secretary, Urban Development Department
B.P. Dharmadhikari
P.D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
