This single-paragraph order disposes of Writ Petition No. 3081 of 2008 by making the rule absolute in terms identical to the companion Writ Petition No. 4499 of 2007, which was decided on the same day, finding the facts to be similar.
Rule made absolute in the same terms as W.P. 4499 of 2007.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VBC 1 wp3081.08-14.6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.3081 OF 2008
M/s.Essel Mining & Industries Ltd. versus
Union of India & Ors.
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Mr.V.Shreedharan with Mr.Prakash Shah i/b.M/s.PDS Legal for the Petitioner.
Mr.Pradeep S.Jetly with Mr.Rajinder Kumar for the Respondents.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA , JJ.
June 14, 2011.
P.C. :
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the
Fifth Respondent state that the facts of this petition are similar to
those in Writ Petition 4499 of 2007 which has been disposed of by a judgment delivered today. For the reasons indicated in the judgment in the companion petition, rule is made absolute in the same terms. There shall be no order as to costs.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( Anoop V. Mohta, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition 4499 of 2007Referred¶14
Writ Petition 4499 of 2007
M/s. Essel Mining & Industries Ltd.
Union of India
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
