Petitioner sought appointment order effective 22.2.2010. Respondents stated vacancies would be considered on merit as they arise. The Court held nothing further survived in the petition and disposed of the Writ Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders.
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WRIT PETITION NO. 2927 OF 2011 SUBHASH NARAYAN GARKAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
... Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Joshi Sunil H. AGP for Respondent(s) 1 & 2 : Smt. Gondhalekar A.V. Advocate for Respondent(s) 3 & 4 : Shri Dhorde R.N.
CORAM : D B BHOSALE & S B DESHMUKH, JJ. Dated: August 04, 2011
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
( S B DESHMUKH, J. ) ( D B BHOSALE, J. ) akl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking appointment order as Administrative Officer should be allowed when respondents state vacancies will be considered on merit.
SUBHASH NARAYAN GARKAL
THE STATE OF MAH
D B BHOSALE
S B DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
