Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition with specific liberty to challenge a specific letter. The court granted the withdrawal and such liberty without examining the merits of the case.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to challenge letter dated 24.8.2007.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
T
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2721 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr.P.N.Anaokar, for the Petitioner. Ms Lata Divekar i/b Pallavi Divekar, for respondent no.1. Mr Rajesh Gehani, for respondent no.2. Mr S.S.Pakale, for respondent no.3. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE AND K.K.TATED, JJ. DATE : 21/11/2011
PC: Mr. Anaokar, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the letter dated 24.8.2007 (Exhibit-3 annexed to the reply affidavit dated 8.8.2011 filed by respondent no.1-Board. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. While granting liberty, it is made clear that we have not examined merits of the case.
(K.K.TATED, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)
2
3
Petitioner
Board
Respondent no.2
Respondent no.3
D.B.BHOSALE
K.K.TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
