The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the present writ petition. The High Court granted leave and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition.
Leave to withdraw writ petition was granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2525.11
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2525 OF 2011
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Shri.M.C. Syed Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri.S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for Respondent
Nos. 1 and 2.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL &
T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE : 12TH DECEMBER, 2011.
1. Learned counsel for the
Petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave
to withdraw the Writ Petition. Leave
granted. The Writ Petition is dismissed
as withdrawn.
[T.V. NALAWADE,J.] [NARESH H.PATIL,J.]
asb/DEC11
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
NARESH H. PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court