This short order of the Appellate Side, Bench at Aurangabad, allowed Civil Application No. 6460 of 2009, holding that the delay claimed by the applicant was condonable for the reasons stated in the application.
Delay in the application was condoned; Civil Application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6460 OF 2009 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO. 12506 OF 2009
| Office Notes, |
Off | ice | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memoranda of | Cora |
m, |
||
| appearances, orders or directio Registrar’s orders |
Cou ns a |
rt’s nd |
Court’s or Judge’s orders | |
| Mr. P.V. applican |
Balkhande h/f. Mr. B.N. Patil, Advocate for t. |
|||
| CORAM DATED |
: NARESH H. PATIL & T. V. NALAWADE, JJ. : 9th December, 2011. |
|||
| PER CO | URT : | |||
| 1. | Heard Mr. P.V. Balkhande holding for Mr. Patil, | |||
| learned respond delay is |
counsel for the applicant. None appears for the ent. For the reasons stated in the application, condoned. Civil Application is allowed. |
|||
| [ T. ssc/ |
V. NALAWADE, J.] [ NARESH H. PATIL, J.] |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay stated in the application warrants condonation of delay.
Balkhande h/f. Mr. B.N. Patil
NARESH H. PATIL
T. V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
