This court dismissed the writ petition ex parte for non-prosecution. As the order decides nothing of general application, no substantive legal proposition is available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-2433-2010
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2433 OF 2010
Kavita Nagesh Thorat ...Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and ors. ...Respondents
None for petitioner.
Ms.Naveena Kumari for respondent nos.1 and 2.
CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
October 7, 2011.
P.C.
None for the petitioner. Dismissed for non prosecution.
(SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)
Kavita Nagesh Thorat
Union of India
B. H. Marlappalle
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
