This is a thin clarificatory order where the High Court of Bombay corrected the subject line and party description in a previous order dated 23/9/2011 regarding a civil application, directing the office to amend the record accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
caf-3614-11
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3614 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 585 OF 2002
Samratmal Chogmal Oswal & Ors.
.. Applicants
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Mr. Vishesh Malviya i/by Federal & Ramshmikant for applicants/org. Respondents.
Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP i/by Mr. A.R.Patil, AGP for State.
CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
OCTOBER 07, 2011.
P.C.
In our order dated 23/9/2011, the first sentence in para 1,
“This is a civil application filed by the legal heirs of Respondent Nos.1 and 3 to bring them on record in the appeal in place of their predecessors.”
2
caf-3614-11
be substituted by the following sentence,
“This is a civil application filed by the Applicants/Orgi. Respondent Nos.2, 4, 6(a), 5, 6(b), 6(c), 6(d), 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 13 to bring legal heirs of Respondent Nos.1 and 3 on record.”
Office to correct the said order accordingly.
(SMT. NISHITA MHATRE,J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)
SAMRATMAL CHOGMAL OSWAL & ORS.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
B. H. MARLAPALLE
NISHITA MHATRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
