This order records the withdrawal of a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The court permitted the withdrawal with liberty, leaving questions open after the investigation was completed and a Charge Sheet filed.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for; all questions left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-237-11.odt
KBP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.237 OF 2011
[Laxman Vs. Ajay]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.Rajiv Patil with Mr.Harshad Bhadbhade, for petitioners.
Mr.Vijay Thorat with Mr.Sanjiv Sawant and Mr.Himanshu Kode, for respondent no.1. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, APP for respondent no.2 State.
CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR &
R.G.KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : 20 th DECEMBER, 2011
P.C.
Learned counsel for the complainant – respondent no.1 states, on instructions, that the investigation of the case is completed and Charge Sheet has been filed before the concerned Court. Since the petition is for quashing of F.I.R., learned counsel for the petitioners, in all fairness, submits that the petitioners would take recourse to the other remedy in law.
2] Accordingly, petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. All questions left open.
[R.G.KETKAR, J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.]
Laxman
Ajay
State
A.M.KHANWILKAR
R.G.KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court