Disposed
Pulin Co. Operative Hsg. Soc Ltd., and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/2275/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp2275-11.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2275 OF 2011
Pulin CHS Ltd. and anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and ors.
..Petitioners
..Respondents
Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr.Vijay Kumar Agarwal, for petitioners.
Ms.Aparna Vatkar, for respondent no.1.
Mr.G.S.Hegde, for respondent nos.2 and 3.
Mr.S.V.Marne, for respondent nos.4 to 6.
CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH &
R.G.KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2011
P.C:
On the motion made by learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition on the came cause of action. Parties are directed to continue to maintain the status-quo for the period of two weeks from today.
[R.G.KETKAR, J.]
[D.K.DESHMUKH, J.]
Pulin CHS Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
D.K.Deshmukh
R.G.Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court