Court recalls a criminal writ petition where the petitioner applied for parole leave. Noting an eight-month pending appeal before the State Government on the parole rejection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp.1976-2011
acd
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1976 OF 2011
Yatendrasingh Ajassingh Chauhan ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent.
Mr. Murtaza Nazmi, for the Petitioner. Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for the State.
CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ.
AUGUST 08, 2011.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Nazmi, the learned appointed Advocate.
2. The petitioner’s application for parole leave was rejected by
the competent authority i.e. Divisional Commissioner and being aggrieved
by the same, he has submitted an appeal to the State Government.
However, the said appeal is pending for the last more than eight months.
2
wp.1976-2011
Authority, we direct that the same be decided on its own merits, as
expeditiously as possible, and preferably by 31st August, 2011.
(U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)
Yatendrasingh Ajassingh Chauhan
State of Maharashtra
B. H. MARLAPALLE
U.D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
