The High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner had previously undertaken to deposit a decretal amount within twelve weeks. Failure to comply with this undertaking resulted in the dismissal of the petition without costs.
The writ petition is dismissed with no orders as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-1895.09
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1895 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Sagar Joshi for the Petitioner. Shri K.S. Patil for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 26TH JULY, 2011
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner
and the learned counsel appearing for the 1st Respondent.
2
wp-1895.09
ash
(A.S.OKA, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-proceeding in light of the petitioner's failure to deposit the decretal amount within the stipulated period.
Petitioner
Respondent No.1
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court