The appellant failed to appear. The court noted service of notice and dismissed the appeal under Order XLI Rule 17 CPC for want of prosecution.
None for the Appellant; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fa522
1
ssp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
FIRST APPEAL NO.522 OF 1991
.............................................................
Office Notes,Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances,Court's Court's or
orders or directions Judge's orders
& Registrar's orders.
.............................................................
None for the Appellant
Mr.G.Vishwanath for the respondent no.1
CORAM: A.S.OKA,J.
DATE : JULY 25,2011
P.C.:
1None appears for the appellant.
Office noting shows that the Court
service notice has been served to the
appellant. Hence, this appeal is
dismissed in exercise of power under
Rule 17 of Order XLI of the Code of
Civil Procedure,1908.
JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Appellant
Respondent No.1
A.S. OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court