Court dismissed a writ petition pending on the termination of services. Counsel submitted petitions were filed in appropriate forums; court disposed of writ petition, keeping contentions open for rise in appeals.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1725 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
1
Mr. A.V. Patil,Advocate for the petitioner Mr. D.R. Kale, AGP for respondents.
CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE :- 1st March, 2011.
PER COURT :-
1] Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that even before filing of the present writ petition, the respondent Management has orally terminated their services and in view thereof, all the petitioners have approached the appropriate forums by filing appeals, challenging their termination. In view thereof, this petition is disposed of. All contentions in the writ petition are kept open to be raised in the appeals filed by the petitioners.
[R.M. BORDE, J.]
[D.B. BHOSALE, J.]
grt/-
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1725 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
2
Petitioners
Respondent Management
D.B. BHOSALE
R.M. BORDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
