The court dismissed the application as it no longer survives in view of the disposal of the parent Writ Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
ca4208.10
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4208 OF 2010 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6565 OF 2009
Office Notes,Office Memoranda
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE &
R.M. BORDE, JJ.
DATED : 25.02.2011
Mr. R.N. Kachave, Advocate for the
applicant.
Mr. P.P. More, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.
1 to 4.
1.In view of disposal of the Writ
Petition, the present application does not
survive and disposed of as such.
[R.M. BORDE,J.] [D.B. BHOSALE,J.]
snk/2011/FEB11/ca4208.10
Applicant
Respondent Nos. 1 to 4
D.B. BHOSALE
R.M. BORDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court