Writ Petition permitted to be withdrawn by the petitioner who was present in court. The court dismissed the petition with no orders as to costs.
Withdrawal of petition allowed; petition dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 17 OF 2011
Jyoti Atmaram Ghag .. Petitioner
Vs
State of Maharashtra & Ors .. Respondents
Mr. Bhavesh Parmar for the Petitioner
Mr. D. U. Mirajkar for Respondent No. 8
Mr. Ameya Tamhane for Respondent No. 10
Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & M.N. GILANI, JJ.
DATE : 21st MARCH, 2011.
PER COURT:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner states on instructions from the petitioner who is present in the Court, that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
[ M.N. GILANI, J ] [ P.V. HARDAS, J ]
1
2
Jyoti Atmaram Ghag
State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
M.N. Gilani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
