Petitioner challenged the trial Court's rejection of an application for production of additional evidence. The Court held the rejection was reasonable and lacking perversity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp1665.11.sxw
gst
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1665 OF 2011
Balwant Vitthal Shedge ... .... .... ..Petitioner. V/s Samabai Dadu Kamble & Anr. ... ... ... ..Respondents.
Mr.Sanjay D. Thokade, Adv. For the petitioner.
CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 9th March, 2011
PC:
By way of present petition the petitioner challenges the order dated 2.1.10.2010 vide which application filed by the present petitioner for production of additional evidence came to be rejected.
Balwant Vitthal Shedge
Samabai Dadu Kamble
B.R. Gavai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
