Petition granted leave to withdraw with liberty to challenge future adverse orders under Order 43 Rule 1A CPC.
Liberty to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the order if the trial court's judgment is adverse.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp275.10.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No. 275 of 2010
Kirtibhai V. Shah & ors. ... Petitioners v/s.
Jay Vijay Construction Co. & ors.
... Respondents
Mr. Sandesh Patil-advocate i/b. P.P. Jadhav-advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S.Dani-advocate i/b N.H. Shukla for respondent no. 1. Mr. Girish Pariyani-advocate i/b. M.S. Lagu-advocate for respondent no.4.
CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J.
DATED :- MARCH 08, 2011.
P.C.
The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the order impugned, in the event, the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court is adverse to his interest and he is required to challenge the same in view of provisions of Order 43 Rule 1A of CPC.
Disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(B.R. GAVAI, J)
Kirtibhai V. Shah
Jay Vijay Construction Co.
B.R. GAVAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
