This petition challenged the validity of member disqualification for non-attendance at meetings. The single-judge court found no jurisdictional error or perversity and dismissed the writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1339 OF 2011
Madhukar s/o. Tulsiram Bargaje, Age : 40 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Wadgaon Dhok, Taluka : Georai, District : Beed. .. Petitioner.
versus The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad, and 11 others. .. Respondents.
Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1, 2 and 3.
Mr. U.M. Indani, Advocate, for respondent no.6 / caveator.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY 2011
(2)
COURT'S ORDER :
( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE
bgp/wp1339
2 issues framed by the court
Whether any jurisdictional error or perversity was committed by the authorities in not disqualifying members who had not attended meetings.
Whether the impugned order of the competent authority removing members was liable to be set aside.
Madhukar s/o. Tulsiram Bargaje
The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
