The Dhule Municipal Corproation Dhule Throu Its Commissioner v. Dattatraya Sadashiv Mangidkar
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2387 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4748 OF 2009
| Office No |
tes, | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memoranda | of | Coram, | |
| appearances, or directions orders |
Cour and |
t’s orders Registrar’s |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
| Mr. Ujjwal Patil, Advocate for applicant. Mr. N.G. Shah, Advocate for respondent. |
|||
| CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 21st February, 2011. |
|||
| PER COURT : | |||
| 1. Heard Advocate Ujjwal Patil for applicant/petitioner | |||
| and Shri. N.G. Shah for respondent. Shri. Shah is contending that the amount sought to be deposited is very less and seeks time to file reply. |
|||
| 2. Without prejudice to rights and contentions of respondent, application is granted in terms of prayer clause "B" and disposed of. |
|||
| [ B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ] ssc/ca2387.11 |
Unknown Applicant
Unknown Respondent
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court