A criminal writ petition was dismissed by the High Court of Bombay, as the court preferred the petitioner to pursue an alternative remedy by filing a private complaint.
Petition disposed of with liberty to file a private complaint.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-1126-2011
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1126 OF 2011
Mr.Madhukar Narayan Dabade
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & anr.
...Respondents
Mr.Anant Vadgaonkar for petitioner. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, APP for State.
CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ.
August 2, 2011.
P.C.
We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and we are
satisfied that the petitioner ought to be relegated to the alternative remedy
of filing a private complaint. Hence the petition is disposed with liberty
to file a private complaint.
(U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)
SRK
The State of Maharashtra & anr.
B. H. MARLAPALLE
U. D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
