Criminal Writ Petition No. 420 of 2011 where the petitioner sought to add robbery charges or implead other accused in the FIR. The bench perused investigation papers and rejected the petition as no case was made out for such directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sat 1 wp 420-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 420 OF 2011
Mrs.Shardadevi Vikramjit Yadav
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
Mr.Shrishail Sakhare for the Petitioner.
Mr.Y.S. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE &
U.D. SALVI, JJ.
AUGUST 1, 2011
P.C. :-
We have heard Mr.Sakhare, the learned Counsel
for the petitioner and we have also perused the
investigation papers and we do not find out any case
made out either to direct to add the charges of
robbery or implead any other accused in the FIR.
The petition is rejected.
(U.D. SALVI, J)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's petition to direct adding robbery charges or impleading other accused in the FIR is admissible.
Whether the petition challenging specific actions in criminal proceedings should be allowed.
Mrs. Shardadevi Vikramjit Yadav
The State of Maharashtra
B.H. Marlappalle
U.D. Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court