ss.1304.95 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN
suit dismissed for want of prosecution; Plaintiffs entitled to refund of Court-fees if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
ndm
13 ss.1304.95
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1304 OF 1995
ION Exchange (India) Limited Vs. M/s. Sparkling Wines and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders
None appears for the parties.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 10th January, 2011.
P.C.
The suit has been listed on the cause list under the caption “dismissal”. In this summary suit of the year 1995, summons for judgment has not been taken out by the Plaintiffs. None appears for the Plaintiffs. This is a fit case where powers of this Court under Rule 227 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules should be exercised by dismissing the suit. Accordingly, the suit stands dismissed for want of prosecution. The Plaintiffs will be entitled to refund, if any, of Court-fees as per rules.
[ A.S.OKA, J ]
AS OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
