The Bombay High Court dismissed a suit for want of prosecution under Rule 227 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1981, noting that summons for judgment had not been issued and the summons period had expired without the plaintiffs taking steps to prosecute.
The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMARY SUIT NO.864 OF 1995
M/s. Air Condition Corporation Ltd.
vs.
Union of India & Ors.
...Plaintiffs
...Defendants
None for the plaintiffs
Mr.Ashok R. Varma i/b S.Bhattacharya for the defendants
CORAM :A.S.OKA,J.
DATE : JANUARY 7, 2011
P.C.:
The suit is shown under the caption �Dismissal�. The
office noting shows that the summons for judgment has not
been taken out. The Advocate for the defendants is
present. This is a fit case where the power under Rule
227 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules,1981
should be exercised by dismissing the suit. Accordingly,
the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit under dismissal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Air Condition Corporation Ltd.
Union of India
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court