Ashok Jaykrushna Joshi v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
267.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
revn 267.10
SSK/941
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 267 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Of Court’s Or Judge’s Orders Coram, appearances,Court’s Orders directions and Registrar’s Orders
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None for the applicants.
Mr. D. R. More, APP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J.
DATED : 23rd NOVEMBER, 2011.
P.C.:
The matter was called out in the morning session when none appeared on behalf of the applicants, and therefore, it was kept back. None appeared on behalf of the applicants when the matter was called out again in the afternoon session. Hence, the criminal revision application is dismissed in default.
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court