The High Court allowed the application for restoration of Criminal Appeal No.2409 of 2010, which had been deemed rejected due to non-payment of costs, accepting the applicant's explanation and undertaking to deposit costs promptly.
Application restored subject to deposit of costs of Rs.2,000/- within three days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
appp-365
srp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIM. APPL. NO. 365 OF 2011
IN
CRIMINAL APPL. NO. 2409 OF 2010
Milan Agrawal. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents.
Mr. Ghansyam Upadhya i/b Law Juris for the applicant. Mr. D. R. More, APP.
Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : November 22, 2011 .
P. C. :
-: 2 :-
appp-365
aforesaid order, Crim. Application No. 151 of 2011 has stood rejected.
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for default dismissal of Criminal Appeal No.2409 of 2010 deserves restoration.
Milan Agrawal
The State of Maharashtra
RANJIT MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
