This order dismissed an interim application for protection or injunction in a specific performance suit. The court granted liberty to the plaintiff to update the record regarding third-party rights.
Motion dismissed with liberty to take out appropriate motion to update the record. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nms3012.06.sxw
1
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3012 OF 2006 IN
SUIT NO. 2303 OF 2006
Krishnamilan G. Shukla ....Plaintiff. Vs.
The Pubjab & Maharashtra Co-operative Bank Ltd., & Ors. Defendants.
Mr. Vikas Pandey i/by Mr. B.P. Pandey for the Plaintiff. Mr. Rahul Rao i/by Mr. I.V. Rao for Defendant No.2.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 9th FEBRUARY, 2011
P.C.:
In a suit for specific performance, the Plaintiff has taken out this
motion for interim protection/ injunction, in August, 2006, but till this
date, it was never persuaded and is pending since then without any interim relief.
2 The learned counsel appearing for the Defendants makes statement that pursuance to the agreement, third party rights have already been created and some parties are joined as party to the suit.
nms3012.06.sxw
2
ssm
Any way, there is no point in keeping this motion pending. However, the liberty is granted to the Plaintiff to take out appropriate motion to bring update record.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Krishnamilan G. Shukla
The Punjab & Maharashtra Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
