Dismissed
Shri. Haresh K. Sippy v. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Bombay HCMCA/39/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
41 mca.39.11
ndm
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. J.K.Thomas i/b M/s.Vidhi Partners for the Applicant. Mr. Vinod Mahadik for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22nd March, 2011.
P.C.
For the reasons recorded in the order passed in Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 35 of 2011, the present miscellaneous civil application is rejected.
[ A.S.OKA, J ]
Applicant
Respondent
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court