The High Court rejected the applicant's application for ad-interim relief because the impugned order dated October 17, 2008 had become moot due to completion of construction, rendering no case for interim intervention.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 caa93-09
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
rpa
CIVIL APPLICATIN NO. 93 OF 2009 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.75 OF 2009
Reliance Infrastructures Ltd. .. Applicant V/s. M/s. New Heaven Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents
Ms. Anjali Chandurkar a/w. Mr. Omkar Chandurkar, Mr. Shawn Fanthome i/b. Mulla & Mulla & CBC for the applicant. Mr. Roshan Tanna i/b. Mr. K. S. Dewal for respondent Nos. 1,4 and 6. Mr. Suvindra K. Chaturvedi fiwht Ms. Kavita Tiwari i/b. M/s. Chaturvedi & Associates for respondent No.7. Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP for respondent No.8.
CORAM : A. S. OKA, J.
DATE : MARCH 21, 2011.
P.C.:-
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. The
impugned order has been passed on 17th October, 2008 by the Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division) Thane. Till today, this Court has not
granted any ad-interim relief. Construction has been completed in
2 caa93-09
the meanwhile. Hence, no case is made out for grant of any interim
relief. Hence, application is rejected.
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether ad-interim relief should be granted when construction has already been completed.
Reliance Infrastructures Ltd.
M/s. New Heaven Pvt. Ltd.
A. S. OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
