This is a brief disposal order where the court examined suit consent terms, found them reasonable, and disposed of the first appeal based on those terms, modifying the impugned decree accordingly.
First appeal disposed of in terms of the consent terms; impugned judgment and decree modified as per such terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO.977 OF 2009
Shri.Kamal Mahavirprasad Morarka .. Appellant V/s
Shri.Mohan Atmaram Patil & Ors.
.. Respondents
Mr.Rajesh Patil, Advocate i/by Mahesh Jani & Co.for the Appellant. Ms.Smita Mhatre, Advocate for Respondent No.1 & 2. Mr.Raju Yamgar, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Appellant and the Respondent Nos.1 and 3 are present in Court.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 10TH JANUARY, 2011
P.C. :
the impugned order and the consent terms arrived at between the appellant and the Respondents which are duly signed by the parties and their respective Advocates. The consent terms are explained to the parties and they admit the contents incorporated and recorded in the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Having examined the same, the consent terms are reasonable and can be accepted. Accordingly, first appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms.
2
extent, as per the consent terms. The decree be drawn in terms
of the consent terms.
(R.G.KETKAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Shri.Kamal Mahavirprasad Morarka
Shri.Mohan Atmaram Patil & Ors.
V.C.DAGA
R.G.KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
