The Civil Application was disposed of without substantive hearing. The associated Writ Petition was expedited and conditionally added to the final hearing board if ready.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw1295-11
rpa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1295 OF 2011 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.10099 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
Mr. S. N. Chandrachud for for the applicant. Mr. Harshad V. Singhapurkar h/f. Mr. Amit Borkar for respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.
DATE : JULY 22, 2011.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
the same shall be added to the appropriate final hearing board as per its turn.
(A.S.OKA, J.)
Applicant
Respondent No.1
A.S. OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
