The High Court of Bombay dismissed the first appeal under Order 41 Rule 17 CPC due to the non-appearance of the appellant when called on the date of hearing.
Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FA No.204/09
Mpt
FARAD CONTINUATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
FIRST APPEAL NO.204 of 2009
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Court's or Judge's Orders
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's Orders
None for the appellant.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATE : 19th January 2011
P.C. :
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal in the absence of the appellant should be dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Appellant
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
