The High Court of Bombay dismissed the civil revision application, noting facts identical to a related case. However, an interim order barred execution of the eviction decree for four weeks to allow the applicant time to challenge the order.
Execution of the eviction decree stayed for four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRA No.5/11
Mpt
FARAD CONTINUATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.5 of 2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Court's or Judge's Orders
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's Orders
Mr. H.P. Pandey for the applicant
Mr.Sandeep M. Kane for respondent nos.1 to 6
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATE : 19th January 2011
P.C. :
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 to 6
D. G. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
