Petitioner sought dismissal of a contempt petition where parties had settled the matter. The court dismissed the contempt petition on the basis of the settlement advice.
The Contempt Petition is dismissed as parties have settled the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 6.conp-66-01
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
jmi
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 66 OF 2001 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2035 OF 1984 IN SUIT NO. 2130 OF 1984.
ICICI Limited
(Formerly known as the Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Limited).
..Petitioner.
vs.
Bright Wires Limited & Anr. ..Respondents.
Mr. Bhalchandra Palav, i/b. Amarchand & Mangaldas & S.A. Shroff & Co., for Petitioner. None for Respondents.
.... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 11 TH NOVEMBER 2011.
P.C. :
The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner informs the Court that the parties have already settled the entire matter and they have been advised not to pursue the Petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. In view thereof, the Contempt Petition is dismissed.
[ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]
ICICI Limited
Bright Wires Limited
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
