The High Court, Bombay permitted the deletion of the name of petitioner no.1 and thus disposed of the civil application without substantive disposition of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pvr １ ca2246-11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2246 OF 2011
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4733 OF 2007
1.Sera Daniel Antony & Ors....Petitioner
vs.
1.The State of Maharashtra & Ors....Respondents
---
Mr.A.M.Dave, for Petitioner.no.1.
Mr.P.S.Dani, for Petitioners 2 to 17.
Mr.A.M.Kulkarni, for Respondents.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATED: 20th October,2011.
P.C.:-
The name of petitioner no.1 Sera Danial
Antony is permitted to be deleted at the risk of
the petitioners. Civil application is disposed
of.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.)
Sera Daniel Antony & Ors
The State of Maharashtra & Ors
D.K.Deshmukh
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court