The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a Civil Application by default after the applicant failed to appear on two occasions.
Civil Application dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12 caw 1395.07.doc
1
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1395 OF 2007 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1425 OF 1995
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
None for the petitioner. Mr.Prashant Kamble i/b Mr. A.S.Rao for respondent no.3.
CORAM : K.K.TATED,J DATE : 13/06/2011
PC:
None for the Petitioner. Heard the learned counsel for Respondent no.3.
On 6th May, 2011 when the matter was called out no one appeared on behalf of Applicant. Today also, no one appeared for the Applicant.
Civil Application is dismissed for default.
(K.K.TATED,J.)
Applicant
Respondent no.3
K.K.TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
