Writ petition challenging an Industrial Court order was dismissed as infructuous since the three-month period specified in the impugned order had expired.
Petition set aside and disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3 wp 2230.11.doc
1
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2230 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr.M.L.Patil for petitioners. Mr. M.S.Topkar for respondent no.1.
CORAM : K.K.TATED,J. DATE : 08/06/2011
PC:
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner - original respondentNashik Municipal Corporation challenges the order dated 5th February, 2011 passed by the learned Member, Industrial Court,
3 wp 2230.11.doc Nashik below Exhibit U-2. The said order was for three months only. Three months are over, petition become infructuous. Same is disposed of as petition is infructuous.
(K.K.TATED,J.)
Nashik Municipal Corporation
Respondent No.1
K.K.TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
