The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of two civil applications after learned counsel for the respondents stated that the compensation amounts had been withdrawn by their clients.
Civil Applications 449 and 450 of 2011 were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caf449-450-11
1
rpa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 449 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 220 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 450 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 221 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
Mr. Pralhad Paranjape i/b. Mr. Tejpal S. Ingale for the applicant.
Mr. Rajesh Patil for respondent No.1in C.A. 449 of 2011 and for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in C.A. 450 of 2011.
Mr. A. R. Patil for the State.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.
DATE : JULY 22, 2011.
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the
respondent No.1 in Civil Application No.449 of 2011 and respondent Nos.1 to 3 in Civil
Application No.450 of 2011 states that the compensation amount has been already withdrawn by his clients. In view of this
caf449-450-11
2
statement, nothing survive in these applications
and the same are disposed of.
(A.S.OKA, J.)
Applicant
Respondent No.1
Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
State
A.S.Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court