Bighneshwar Laxman Sahu v. Ceat India Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application by original respondent for early hearing date was rejected as final hearing was not possible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw1134-11
1
ttm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1134 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.921 OF 2006
Bighneswar Laxman Sahu
.. Applicant
Vs.
Ceat India Ltd. .. Respondent
Ms.Vaishali U. Jain for the applicant
Mr.S.K.Talsania, Sr.Counsel with Ms.Pallavi Dedhia i/b M/s.Sanjay Udeshi and Co. for the respondent
CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE: 28th JUNE, 2011
P.C.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
Bighneswar Laxman Sahu
Ceat India Ltd.
K.K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court