The single-judge civil court condoned the delay alleged by the respondents' non-appearance and accepted the applicant's averments to dispose of the civil application ex-parte without order as to costs.
Civil application disposed of; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cal203.11.sxw
1
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 203 OF 2011 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO. 14947 OF 2011
Dhutum Grampanchayat
....Applicant.
Vs.
IOT Infrastructure & Energy Ltd.& Ors.
...Respondents.
Mr.A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Rahul Thakur with Ms. Samata Kakade and Ms. Sonia Ekbote for the Applicant. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for Respondent No. 3.
CORAM :- D.K DESHMUKH AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE :- 22 NOVEMBER, 2011.
P.C. :-
The learned counsel appearing for the Applicants states that the Respondents have been served. He undertakes to file affidavit of service. None appears for the Respondents. In the absence of any affidavit in reply, accepting averments made in the Civil Application, delay is condoned. The Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
Dhutum Grampanchayat
IOT Infrastructure & Energy Ltd.
D.K. Deshmukh
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
