In Civil Application No. 922 of 2011, the Single Judge allowed the application for restoration of a suit/appeal, finding that a case for restoration was made out based on averments made in the application.
The application was allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caf922-11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
rpa
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.922 OF 2011 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.3185 OF 2006
Manohar Gangaram Hole Since deceased through his LR's Deepak Manohar Hole & Ors. ... Applicants V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. G. K. Mourya i/b. P.H. Potnis for the applicants. Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP for the respondent – State.
CORAM : A. S. OKA, J.
DATE : MARCH 25, 2011.
P.C.:-
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicants and the
learned AGP appearing for the respondent-State. In view of the averments made in the application, a case for restoration is made out. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration was maintainable.
Deepak Manohar Hole & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
A. S. OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
