Allowed
Shakeel Muneer Ahmed Kasim Ali v. Maniklal Bhimji Oza
Bombay HCCAA/309/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caf309-11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
rpa
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.309 OF 2011 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER ST. NO. 1777 OF 2011
Shakeel Muneer Ahmed Kisam Ali & Ors. .. Applicants
V/s.
Maniklal Bhimji Oza & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Indraprakash Tripathi i/b. Mr. C. K. Tripathi for the applicants. Mr. J. M. Chodankar for respondent No.1.
CORAM : A. S. OKA, J.
DATE : MARCH 25, 2011.
P.C.:-
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicants and the
learned counsel appearing for the first respondent who is the only contesting party. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Delay is condoned. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay.
Whether the application should be allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
A. S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court