A single judge of the Bombay High Court condensed the delay of 66 days in filing Civil Application No. 2979 of 2010. The judge held that sufficient cause existed and disposed of the application accordingly.
Condonation of delay of 66 days and disposal of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2979 OF 2010 IN
FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 24895 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Ms Pallavi N. Dabholkar for the Applicant. Shri Atul N. Katkar h/f Shri Dilip Bodake for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 27TH JANUARY, 2011
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicants and the Learned counsel appearing for the Respondents. The application is opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents. Delay of 66 days has been adequately explained. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Delay is condoned. Application is disposed of accordingly.
(A.S.OKA, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause has been established for condoning a delay of 66 days in filing the application.
Farad
Respondent No.1
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court