Inderjit Kaur Matharu v. Revolan Campos
Case brief
What is this about?
In this interim order, the Court granted a stay on the First Appeal and directed the applicant to refrain from creating third-party rights or parting with the possession of the suit premises during the pendency of proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Stay granted subject to the applicant not creating third party rights and not parting with possession of the suit premises.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Caf-1363.10
Ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1363 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 568 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Sandesh D. Patil for the Applicant. Shri K.H. Holambe Patil for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 27TH JANUARY, 2011
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. The First Appeal has been admitted for final hearing. Therefore, stay will have to be granted. However, the applicant will have to be restrained from creating any third party rights and from parting with possession of the suit premises.
- Hence, the application is disposed of by passing the following order.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant a stay of execution and reservation of possession of the suit premises pending the final hearing of the First Appeal?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ash
- respondent
FARAD
Coram
A.S. OKA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court